Charlie

113 reputation

bio	website
	location
	age
visits	member for	1 year, 2 months
	seen	Jun 3 at 6:21
stats	profile views	1

	113 reputation	bio	website		visits	member for	1 year, 2 months
5 badges		location			seen	Jun 3 at 6:21

summary answers questions tags badges favorites bounties reputation activity

21 Actions

suggestions reviews revisions comments badges posts accepts all

Dec 24	awarded	Teacher
Oct 28	answered	Attention Theory: is it impossible to avoid distraction?
Oct 17	awarded	Scholar
Oct 17	accepted	Differences in willingness to correct errors made between human and computer interactions
Oct 17	comment	Differences in willingness to correct errors made between human and computer interactions Yes. Social desirability covers the general phenomena pretty well. Didn't find anything specifically on error reporting, so I guess that link is for me to make.
Oct 15	revised	Differences in willingness to correct errors made between human and computer interactions added 434 characters in body; edited title
Oct 15	asked	Differences in willingness to correct errors made between human and computer interactions
Aug 11	comment	Controlling for response bias in a forced choice memory task I ended up running the experiment with the inclusion of unseen items, and will control for the observed response bias across those (as if no bias they should be selected with equal frequency) with an ANCOVA.
Aug 11	comment	Controlling for response bias in a forced choice memory task True, moving to confidence ratings rather than yes / no would allow exclusion of guesses. I'd be worried about excluding too many with only the suggested four options, but I agree something along those lines should work.
Aug 3	revised	Controlling for response bias in a forced choice memory task added 19 characters in body
Aug 3	revised	Controlling for response bias in a forced choice memory task added 51 characters in body
Aug 3	asked	Controlling for response bias in a forced choice memory task
Apr 20	comment	How to assess participant awareness of experimental deception without inducing awareness? Yes, the inclusion of a question that's innocuous when the answer would be 'no' but still clear when the answer would be 'yes' is a great idea. I'm not sure whether I can pull it off for mine, but will try.
Apr 17	awarded	Supporter
Apr 16	comment	How to assess participant awareness of experimental deception without inducing awareness? ok, cheers, though I still can't find much info, as you suggest... is the 'funnel', starting with vague questions, thought to minimise demand characteristics from the final direct question?
Apr 15	awarded	Editor
Apr 15	revised	How to assess participant awareness of experimental deception without inducing awareness? edited title
Apr 15	comment	How to assess participant awareness of experimental deception without inducing awareness? it's related to change blindness yes, and I am going through that literature - but this is a broader problem than that, 'how to ask someone something without them being informed by the question'. Quite possibly a hopeless task, I realise, but I wanted to see if anyone had further ideas.
Apr 15	comment	How to assess participant awareness of experimental deception without inducing awareness? essentially: there is an image of a scene with items in it, the scene is then altered somewhat, I want to attain most accurate reports of noticed alteration with minimal provocation of the noticing.
Apr 15	awarded	Student