Reputation
908
Top tag
Next privilege 1,000 Rep.
Edit questions and answers
Badges
4 18
Newest
 Yearling
Impact
~18k people reached

Mar
23
comment Why does speaking disrupt rhythm?
Serious question: does this still happen if you talk at the same BPM as the music (or happen as strongly)? My suspicion would be that we only have one processing region for decoding rhythm (I doubt that's correct, but...) - which would be crucial for speech and other sound-related tasks, mostly because rhythm can carry a great deal of the semantics of auditory information.
Mar
8
answered Is fear rational?
Feb
7
awarded  Informed
Feb
7
answered Teaching Problem Solving : Mastering bit by bit Vs Try it all by yourself?
Feb
4
awarded  Nice Answer
Jan
28
comment What is the definition of pathology?
I believe so, yes. Similar to, or the same as, the difference between an (ignorable) impulse and a compulsion. (They may still get some enjoyment from gambling, but it's not something they have control over anymore).
Jan
28
answered What is the definition of pathology?
Jan
26
comment How to optimize bi-tasking?
could a person read a book and then listen to another audio book at the same time? - unlikely, considering that in both cases one is processing speech (reading / listening may be possible, but dialog would present a problem). I don't have a reference for this at the moment, but similar processing tasks will overlap each other. Reading/listening would overlap while doing dishes/listening would not.
Jan
25
comment What is the definition of pathology?
Related info from Wikipedia: The word pathology is from Ancient Greek πάθος, pathos, "feeling, suffering"; and -λογία, -logia, "the study of". Pathologization, to pathologize, refers to the process of defining a condition or behavior as pathological, e.g. pathological gambling.
Jan
20
comment What's the frequency of the ringing in my ear?
I like the question, it's really interesting, but I down-voted for no research effort. A Google search for 'ringing in ears' would have told you this is tinnitus, which would have opened the doors to further research.
Jan
18
awarded  Yearling
Jan
9
comment What happens in your brain when a concept “clicks”?
I'm curious about the concept (+1 for the question) but perhaps Google may lead you to general background info (-1 for no research effort).
Jan
6
comment Evidence that qualia are not the same as physical processes?
Yeah, I realized I was asking someone to prove a negative not long after posting. On the other hand, I see so much hoopla about 'qualia', when the most fitting explanation that I can put together is that they're artifacts of scope (from a psychology or philosophy that has little basis in neuroscience).
Jan
4
asked Evidence that qualia are not the same as physical processes?
Jan
4
comment Do widespread brain toxins explain violence rates?
I understand now. I'm curious still: do you doubt the research or linked papers in the article? It seems that the article, or the linked papers, readily answer your first question. Unfortunately, I suspect there are many reasons for a slightly smaller prefrontal cortex than just toxins and more reasons for violence than a small prefrontal cortex. Also, considering that anything in sufficient quantity can be a toxin, I suspect that the last two questions are too broad for us to be able to answer here.
Jan
4
comment Do feelings have a purpose?
+1 for "free won't"
Jan
4
comment Do widespread brain toxins explain violence rates?
Welcome to CogSci.SE! A few suggestions: at the end of the question you actually have 3 questions. I would recommend creating separate questions on CogSci for each. Remember that we ask you to do some initial research first though! Speaking of research, have you read the entire Mother Jones article? Considering the amount of evidence that they have, I would highly doubt that there is any other explanation...
Jan
3
answered Is the energy of an action potential divided among multiple axon terminals?
Jan
2
comment Do feelings have a purpose?
This isn't to say don't use analogy; analogy is a very powerful tool. But when using analogy be very careful to explain far more about where the analogy fails than about where it succeeds.
Jan
2
comment Do feelings have a purpose?
Sure, but the analogy gets really complicated really quickly: unlike a car, just 'putting more oil in' doesn't work to correct an imbalance. Ultimately, the problem isn't that the analogy doesn't work for every aspect of neurotransmitters (because we know this and can alter our knowledge and representations to allow for this), but that others will believe that it DOES work that way. If we start spouting analogies, other people will take them a step farther, then another step farther, and then a few more steps, until we have a bunch of that 'neuro-myth' bunk.