Forbidden Overseer

less info
475 reputation
211
bio website bharadwajs.net
location India
age 21
visits member for 1 year, 11 months
seen Jul 9 at 11:33

I am a graduate in Computer Science Engineering from India. I pass my time by participating in Stack Exchange and surfing the web.

I am interested in wide range of topics, and you can see some of those on my stack exchange profile. :)


Sep
3
comment Do the Jungian Cognitive Functions/ Processes really exist?
Firstly, sorry for my late reply and I appreciate the answer. But, I have made some changes to the question (clearly explained what changes in edit section) - and it will be nice if you can take a look at the new question and update your answer if possible. The question (edited one?) is lot more oriented towards neocortex regions and the truth about what he says about those regions (used for some activity etc.). After confirming that, next would be the question about patterns and then would be the question about their link with Jung's cognitive functions.
Sep
3
comment Do the Jungian Cognitive Functions/ Processes really exist?
@ArtemKaznatcheev: Yeah, thanks for the advice! In this question, I had two things to confirm: one being the regions where Nardi placed EEG sensors in brain and areas he says that they co-relate to and the other one is about what he says about these patterns he observed and when he observed them. All of this is actually pretty much in the first link itself, but I will emphasize what I wanted to understand/confirm in the edit I am going to make now.
Aug
20
comment Is the theory of Information Metabolism a reasonable scientific theory?
@Kris: Not just a scientific basis, but also a reasonable explanation for the scientific basis and the development of theory that has been done.
Aug
17
comment Is there any Personality theory that uses scientific methodology instead of subjective interpretations?
@JeromyAnglim: I have changed the question. You can check out edits to see the changes I made.
Aug
17
comment Do the Jungian Cognitive Functions/ Processes really exist?
@JeromyAnglim: I have edited the Additional Material part of question accordingly.
Aug
17
comment What makes people easily subscribe to pseudoscientific theories?
Oh, there is a term for it!! Thanks for pointing that out. Even a greater irony is that I subscribed to this pseudoscience without even knowing it exists!! LOL
Aug
16
comment Is there any Personality theory that uses scientific methodology instead of subjective interpretations?
To Everyone: I have broken this question down into four others - cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/1555/… cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/1554/… cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/1553/… cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/1556/… Please take a look. Thanks!