Cognitive Sciences Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Transformational leadership is sometimes recommended as a way of motivating and inspiring followers in contrast to more transactional styles of leadership.

There is a large pop-psych literature on leadership, but I'm specifically interested in scientifically rigorous empirical evidence supporting or not supporting the value of transformational leadership.

  • What is the empirical support for transformational leadership?
share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Here is one meta analytic comparison:

Bernard M. Bass is one of the most cited researchers on this field: Here is one of his articles but there are plenty on the net:

I think he is also author of MLQ - multifaceted survey of leadership.

There is also revised theory by Bass and Avolio: The implications of transactional and transformational leadership.

And also: Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multi-factor Leadership; Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology. 2010.

share|improve this answer
Can you elaborate or summarize these articles? Otherwise this answer is too vague. – Software Mechanic Jun 4 '13 at 10:06
Yes. Transformational leadership is overrated IMO. New findings shows that different situations need different leadership styles. There are plenyty of books/articles on this theme if was trying to be concise to answer 'empirical support'. – ICanFeelIt Jun 4 '13 at 10:30

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.