Take the 2-minute tour ×
Cognitive Sciences Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am basically looking for two words which are related to some degree. Ultimately the same word might even be the answer to both parts of this question. I split them up into two questions (see also Technical term for the loss of words in your mother-tongue when speaking a different language).

Anyhow, here's what I'm trying to give a name.
If you think about a random word – take any – and you say it repeatedly, over and over again, and think even more about it, then – sometimes – it may happen to you that the word sounds more unfamiliar to you, and you start wondering if this word exists at all. Then, if you use it in a specific phrase or sentence, you also start doubting if you can use this word in that context at all.

Is there a technical term for the loss of understanding of words or phrases which you actually not only know by heart but also are able to use off-the-cuff under normal circumstances?

share|improve this question
    
Sounds like a consequence of cognitive elaboration on the part of the thinker and some counter-intuitive qualities of the word in question. Can't say as I know a term for it though. Welcome to cogsci.SE BTW; hope you find what you're looking for! –  Nick Stauner Mar 28 at 13:42
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Sounds like what you're describing is "semantic satiation". Wikipedia explains:

The explanation for the phenomenon was that verbal repetition repeatedly aroused a specific neural pattern in the cortex which corresponds to the meaning of the word. Rapid repetition causes both the peripheral sensorimotor activity and the central neural activation to fire repeatedly, which is known to cause reactive inhibition, hence a reduction in the intensity of the activity with each repetition.

English.SE also has some good answers related to usage of this term, rather than the neurological/psychological mechanics of the phenomenon itself.

share|improve this answer
    
Good answer. Some citations wouldn't go amiss though - I'd recommend Balota and Black (1997). –  Eoin Mar 31 at 13:29
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.