Cognitive Sciences Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm thinking about studying neuroscience, but the only interests I have in the general area are:

  • Where thought or consciousness come from and how it all works
  • How memory works and why it can't be accessed at all times
    • Can it be increased, and does it have a limit?
    • How a smell can bring back a memory?
    • Why, if I remember a scene or a moment, can I not relive an entire day or month? Will this be possible in the future?

Also, I love biology and am doing a course in chemistry and lab work at the moment, but I'm afraid I'll be disappointed if I study neuroscience for these reasons. Are these questions more theoretical and philosophical than what a neuroscience student would actually study?

share|improve this question

closed as primarily opinion-based by what, Chuck Sherrington, Christiaan, Krysta, Arnon Weinberg Mar 3 '15 at 18:02

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

What do you like about biology, chemistry, and lab work? I'd say your interests as described fall more directly within the domain of cognitive psychology, except in as much as neuroscience involves biochemistry and lab work somewhat more. If you love these things, I don't think you've been fair to the breadth of your interest in neuroscience! Of course, that's a likely consequence of not having actually studied it that much yet. To some extent you have to give it a chance to know what your interests really are. They're bound to grow if the fit is right. – Nick Stauner Feb 16 '14 at 3:24
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is about a personal choice of careers – Christiaan Mar 3 '15 at 10:55

Cognitive sciences are an interdisciplinary field between:

  • psychology
  • sociology
  • philosophy
  • medical sciences
  • biology
  • physics
  • chemistry
  • palaeontology / anthropology
  • ethnology
  • information sciences
  • linguistics
  • I believe I forgot something

The core is probably somewhere around psychology, neurobiology (including endocrinology) and artificial intelligence, though others would lay the focus elsewhere.

It does not matter much which of these fields you study, if you aim at an academic career studying cognition, because you will have to make yourself familiar with, or even an expert, in most of the other fields, if you want to go beyond a master's degree. Where you put your focus, is a matter of personal preference, and no matter where that is, you will be working in a team of experts from different fields. I'm studying psychology, and at our institute (of psychology) we have researchers who studied medicine, physics, information science, and pedagogy. In the neuroscience institute next door, there are psychologists, biologists, medical scientists (including psychiatrists) and probably more that I don't know. Despite their different backgrounds, they now all work on the same research topics.

So while it does not matter (much) which first topic you choose, you need to be open and curious of mind, to be successful in science. If, as you say, you are interested only in a very narrow field, interdisciplinary work will be impossible for you. You won't be able to follow your topic to where it leads you. Sometimes, when you research something, you realize that the answer to a relevant question, that you need to answer before you can go on, lies in another field. Then you must study that field. If you don't, that will hamper your understanding and research.

The best scientists, in my opinion, are those that are basically curious and want to understand and learn. They all have their individual talents, and certainly no one can know and understand everything, but the most successful researchers today are experts in several fields and interested in several others.

On the other hand, there are those hard working lab rats that get things done, and they are invaluable, too. The question is, can you see yourself as doing the grunt work, or do you want to really understand it all?

But then maybe that is all something you cannot know in advance. You need to experience things to know if they are for you or not. When I was fresh from school, I had very limited interests and a wide array of clearly defined dislikes (everything I had to learn in school). But in the years that followed, I understood that I am basically interested in everything, even the subjects that I hated in school. And what I found the most interesting at first, I lost interest in after studying it for a few years. Now I study something else.

What I would recommend is:

  • read the internet sites of the university institutes and some introductory textbooks in the three or four fields that you are most interested in
  • choose the one whose methodology you like best: do you want to dissect brains, do statistical data analysis, program software, work on people or animals, theorize or spend nights in the lab, ... ?
  • study that
  • if after a year or two you realize you want something else, switch (but understand that every field includes stuff you find boring)
  • finish your master's
  • reflect on what you learned and understand what interests you for the next few years
  • find a research group and do your Ph.D.
  • again reflect and decide on the next steps
  • don't worry, there are many successful non-linear careers in science
share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.