Cognitive Sciences Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am working on an app where we are aiming to develop peer to peer training. How could we gamify the learning process to make it more fun?

share|improve this question

closed as too broad by Chuck Sherrington, Community, Artem Kaznatcheev, AsheeshR, caseyr547 Jan 13 '14 at 15:34

There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Can you elaborate on what you mean on peer training? What are the goals of the application? What kin of things did you have in mind? – Jeromy Anglim Nov 20 '13 at 6:15

For starters, I think it's a good idea to provide rewards for both students and mentors. As an example: Mentors could receive rewards for answering questions by students, while students receive rewards for solving exercises. Furthermore, the mentor should be able to give rewards for good questions etc.

Actually, it's quite a bit like Stack Exchange, if you think about it. Only, without exercises and without the ability to directly ask one particular teacher who can be rewarded for answering and also reward you for a good question.

Another idea that pops up immediately, is to have team or group exercises with predefined roles. For example, if the exercises includes writing a calendar program (like Google calendar). One person could be responsible for graphical design, one for coordination etc. This is maybe not an ideal scenario since a task like that would be quite extensive but I think you get the picture.

In general, I think it's not that difficult to represent the traditional relation between student and mentor. This system is, in a sense, already includes rewards. However, the difference between the traditional system and an app like yours is really the possibility to engage in learning because you feel interest or curiosity about the subject. Having someone who can help and reward you only fuels the intrinsic motivation you already have. In that sense, I believe what really counts is that a system like the one you outline offers a sense of security for the student. The gamification is mostly based on extrinsic motivation and as such only an added bonus. The ability to connect based on interest and the desire to learn is what really makes the difference, I think.

I recommend the documentary 'Alphabet' which recently premiered. In this film, there is also a high emphasis on learning as a game, even though it may not exactly be what you're looking for, it might nevertheless provide some inspiration.

share|improve this answer

The game mechanics playdeck from tech startup SCVNGR gives 50 great starting points.

Perhaps more directly relevant to the SE CogSci audience is the Mental Notes project, which aims to "bring a little psychology to Web design [...] each card describes one insight into human behavior and suggests ways to apply this to the design of Web sites, Web apps, and software applications.".

share|improve this answer
welcome to the site, I don't think the Cognitive Sciences audience has any preferences towards web based design or programming, that's a hang over from Stack Overflow. :) – user3543 Nov 24 '13 at 22:15
I meant more that it specifically references psychology, rather than just the implied psychological connection of game mechanics :-) – Jonathan Deamer Nov 24 '13 at 22:17
oh lol, u can tell I didn't read thoroughly. cheers. caught out :) – user3543 Nov 24 '13 at 22:20

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.