Take the 2-minute tour ×
Cognitive Sciences Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have noticed a tendency these days for people to take pictures of the things they see in the public with their phones. This is fine, but I have found that it has gone to an extend where in a dire situation, people were too busy taking pictures of the scene (for blogging, Facebook, etc) to call the police or help the victims.

Having that said, I'm not sure if this is just my own observation. Are there any studies or even terms or keywords describing and explaining such phenomenon?

share|improve this question
    
No joy with the bounty. –  user3543 Oct 31 '13 at 1:11
    
@Skippy Thanks, Skippy for the bounty! yea, kinda sad that there aren't much materials on this topic yet, which I believe isn't quite new at all. I will update this place along the way if I find anything related. –  xenon Nov 1 '13 at 11:12
    
Yes pls and feel free to post more Q&As you would be a valued member here :) –  user3543 Nov 1 '13 at 11:36

1 Answer 1

Firstly historical background:

The phenomena of people witnessing atrocities and not acting predates photo taking. It is known as Diffusion of responsibility or Bystander effect. (1) The likelihood of an individual offering assistance or calling for help is inversely proportion to the number of people present in the group.

This phenomena can be attributed to the concepts of deindividuation (2) and victim blaming (3). Deindividuation is the notion that an individual loses their independent consciousness to a degree as being drawn into a group consciousness, that acting within a group, revokes all personal responsibility and accountability for actions or inactions.

Victim blaming is the propensity for people to blame the victims of violent crimes for somehow being complicit in bringing about the crime. By reckless behavior, perceived immoral conduct. This can the false comfort people seek as a protection, that it wouldn't happen to them, as such events are not part of chance, but rather have causal roots within the victim.

I believe the cause underlying this mentality runs deeper into the human psyche and taps into a primitive part of human nature that will form a subconscious alliance with the perceived stronger aggressor and so have less mercy towards the weaker victim. This is seen in more personal and extreme cases in the Stockholm Syndrome and on the coninuum of domestic violence. The following quote demonstrates this argument where the threat is real and present. I postulate this fear is underlying within many people's subconscious.

It is important to remember that Stockholm Syndrome develops subconsciously and on an involuntary basis. The strategy is a survival instinct that develops as an attempt to survive in a threatening and controlling environment. (4)

Photo taking:

There has always been a voyeuristic nature to photography. (5)

The advent of internet communication, social media and the glut of social networking platforms have given rise to a popular form of communication, via the image. Pinterest being a good example. The availability of new technologies enabling people to take photos and upload instantly online, makes a tragic scene an tantalising opportunity for individuals to gain recognition online. Perhaps enhancing their perceived status or popularity, at the very least gaining them attention.

The psychology of the photographer:

This is a little researched area. I cannot find much on this topic, maybe somebody else can.

This book by Joel Morgovsky examines some of these issues (I am unable to quote further than the following):

While photographs are the most abundant image form in the world today, they are, at the same time, also the least carefully analyzed. Not one psychologist, to this writer’s knowledge, has attempted to apply relevant research on imagery and the creative process to the study of photographs as personal and cultural communications. Writers, painters, sculptors and scientists have served for years as illustrations of the creative personality, the creative process, and the creative product; photographers and photographs have not (Lindauer, 1977). (6)

It appears Joel Morgovsky has an interest in ongoing research into this:

According to Div. 1 (Society for General Psychology) member Joel Morgovsky, pictures aren't just windows through which we look out onto the world--they also serve as mirrors into the photographer's mind. (7)


References:

share|improve this answer
1  
Stockholm Syndrome...very interesting. Later added: Holy crap, this is an interesting post. I'm not sure how you wouldn't be awarded this. Lol, I bookmarked. –  Taal Oct 27 '13 at 9:01
    
@Taal I was using an extreme example, as I got tired of searching for references for my argument! –  user3543 Oct 27 '13 at 9:04
    
I read further into "Stockholm Syndrome," and although you cite it as an extreme case I believe that this does not only occur in extreme cases. I think it happens constantly and is on a spectrum - "an attempt to survive in a threatening and controlling environment" is narrow. Think about in school everyone wanting to be friends with or associate to the "popular kids"...many times without reason. Think about how most people act around celebrities...there's many examples. Lol I remember being in Stockholm ironically & Swedes explaining this syndrome to me..of course without the label –  Taal Oct 27 '13 at 9:12
    
Just read your comment, heh. I completely understand - I think you know my feelings on *cough*...ane..c..d..o...*cough*. Part of them were derived out of having to use that strategy at times :) –  Taal Oct 27 '13 at 9:16
    
@Taal I totally agree! that's my point. lol –  user3543 Oct 27 '13 at 9:16

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.