Cognitive Sciences Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Over the decades there have been several theories from various aspects of cognitive science that have appealed to a link between perception and action as a way of understanding information processing in the brain. The example that I'm most familiar with is Liberman and Mattingly's Motor Theory of Speech Perception [1], which, starting almost 50 years ago, made the following claims (reviewed in [2]):

  1. "speech is special" -- there are specialized pathways in auditory cortex for processing speech
  2. perceiving speech is perceiving the speech gestures of the talker, not necessarily the acoustic patterns of the speech waveform
  3. the motor system is recruited for processing speech

Although more recent work in neuroscience has discredited many of these claims, particularly the first one, there do seem to be several recent results (e.g., [3], [4], [5], [6]) that establish a very interesting link between speech perception and motor cortex activity.

At a higher level, this sort of theory fits into the general "emulation" framework proposed by Grush [7], and also agrees well with insights from the mirror-neurons branch of neuroscience research.

My question is, now that all of this "newer" research is five to ten years old, have there been even more recent results -- especially from non-speech areas of cognitive science -- that might help form a unified theory of action and perception ? How might we go about building up such a unified theory based on what's currently known ? What further studies or models do we need to evaluate emulation as a fundamental building block of cognition ?


[1] A Liberman, D Mattingly. "The motor theory of speech perception revised." Cognition. (1985)

[2] B Galantucci, CA Fowler, MT Turvey. "The motor theory of speech perception reviewed." Psych. Bull. Rev. (2011)

[3] SM Wilson et al. "Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production." Nature neuroscience. (2004)

[4] L Fadiga, L Craighero, G Buccino, G Rizzolatti. "Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study." European J of Neuroscience. (2002)

[5] F Pulvermueller et al. "Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds." PNAS. (2006)

[6] A D'Ausilio et al. "The Motor Somatotopy of Speech Perception." Current Biology. (2009)

[7] R Grush. "The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception" Behavioral & Brain Sciences. (2006)

share|improve this question

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.