Take the 2-minute tour ×
Cognitive Sciences Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm interested in performing a psychological experiment from my own home (the research is controversial; not that it's unethical, but rather I won't be able to aquire funding for it) and in it I would like to measure the arousal level of my participants as accurately and - possibly even more important - as cheaply as possible. I have a regular computer with USB ports, and even though I prefer to work with OS X, I could use Linux, and, if I really was forced to, even Windows.

I'm thinking that galvanic skin response is the best measure because of the method's temporal responsiveness, but I guess heart rate could be used as well.

Does anybody know of any good and cheap instruments that can a) measure arousal level and b) can be connected to a regular computer?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

I think you may have answered your own question.

You can build a GSR meter or purchase one online. You do not necessarily need to hook it up to your computer; if it has an LED you can simply record the results with pen and paper. If you want to measure heart rate, buy a stethoscope. Or if you want to be really cheap, check your pulse using two fingers; it's free.

Note that I have no experience with building my own GSR meter or using the GSR meter that I've linked to. I cannot vouch for the accuracy or reliability of these devices. The familiar adage is probably appropriate: you get what you pay for.

share|improve this answer
    
Well, I need something that records straight to the computer during an experiment, and it needs to be really accurate, so recording something with pen and paper will not do (that is, that method does not satisfy requirement b above). To bad you can't connect the GSR meter you linked to to a computer via USB, because it would be perfect! –  Speldosa Nov 11 '12 at 22:16
    
can you elaborate on why you need to connect it to a computer? the device has a digital readout. writing this down using pen and paper does not make it less accurate. –  Jeff Nov 11 '12 at 22:19
    
The effects I will be looking for might appear within a time frame of half, or a quarter, of a second and I will be recording for 20-30 minutes per participant. I don't think I have it in me to write down 4 results per second for half an hour :) –  Speldosa Nov 11 '12 at 22:22
    
Do you know what your desired signal would look like? At 1/4 second per response, you are looking at sampling at at least 8 times per second, thats ~14000 data points per recording. Are you certain you would be able to see what you are looking for among so much data? –  Alex Stone Nov 11 '12 at 22:28
1  
I have changed the link to a device that is cheaper, but has a USB connection and monitors GSR, heart rate, and respiration rate. Again, I have not used the device. –  Jeff Nov 11 '12 at 22:29

I've long been thinking that arousal levels can be measured by an actigraph, although I have not seen scientific articles that deal with this topic. Nor did I conduct any kind of large scale test. A lot of actigraphy studies focus on sleep and distinguishing sleep from wakefulness. I hypothesize that actigraphy may say something about the level of arousal of the central nervous system.

But the good thing is that actigraphy that uses an iPhone as a sensor is practically free. I have just submitted an mood tracking app to the app store (still to be reviewed) that has two tools illustrated below. The app will be free, and I built it for experiments of my own. My previous incarnations of this app were able to provide information in 5 second epochs in comma separated format. That data could be analyzed with excel. The way I sent myself the data is by emailing myself the report.

An actigraph is a device (or an app) that analyzes human motion at rates of about 20 times per second. It looks at acceleration and rotational rate caused by voluntary and involuntary movement. Think about it as an evolution of a pedometer. The device is continuously compounding motion activity into bigger epochs. In the picture below, real time data is compounded into 5 second epochs that are presented by graphs that appear on the device with only 5 seconds of delay. The activity count varies between 10 (complete stillness) to ~300 (typing a question in a SE site) to 10000 (walking). Data can be compounded further, into 5 minute epochs, suitable for long-term monitoring.

The magic of actigraphy comes from the fact that activity can be observed over an extended period of time. For example, there are scoring rules that distinguish sleep from wakefulness based on 7 minute windows of data. I'd love to learn if there's something like this for the arousal in the waking world.

Alternatively, there are heart rate apps, like Azumio's Instant heart rate

Actigraph

The second tool is a self-reporting tool, based on Pick A Mood , where by breaking the "mood" into two components, it becomes more evident that a person is experiencing different levels of arousal.

Self reporting mood

share|improve this answer
    
Seems interesting. I will check it out! However, this won't do for my experiment, since my participants will be seated and just look at a monitor. That is; there won't be very much movement to record in the first place. –  Speldosa Nov 11 '12 at 22:18
    
The example above with green and yellow bars is me sitting in front of a computer programming. The device is extremely sensitive to movement, and even irregular movement (1 in 60 seconds) will be seen. –  Alex Stone Nov 11 '12 at 22:25
    
And its recorded only with your iPhone (no extra equipment)? –  Speldosa Nov 11 '12 at 22:26
    
Yes, iPhone contains and accelerometer and a gyroscope that is sufficient for motion tracking –  Alex Stone Nov 11 '12 at 22:29
    
This is a clever idea, but if actigraphy-while-stationary hasn't been validated as a measure of arousal, then it's probably not a good idea for these purposes. You don't want to pair an already-controversial hypothesis with a measurement method that's also untested. –  octern Nov 13 '12 at 18:49

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.