Take the 2-minute tour ×
Cognitive Sciences Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Example: In class, when a teacher proposes some unreasonable assignment, students hesitate to express their objection until someone steps-up and then others find courage to talk.

I've tried searching for the term for this phenomenon but I don't know what I'm looking for exactly.

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

One related term I found is the bandwagon effect.

In layman’s term the bandwagon effect refers to people doing certain things because other people are doing them, regardless of their own beliefs, which they may ignore or override.

The general rule is that conduct or beliefs spread among people, as fads and trends clearly do, with "the probability of any individual adopting it increasing with the proportion who have already done so". (Colman, Andrew 2003) As more people come to believe in something, others also "hop on the bandwagon" regardless of the underlying evidence.

Colman, Andrew (2003). Oxford Dictionary of Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 77. ISBN 0-19-280632-7.

share|improve this answer
    
Although this effect is similar. I think there is a slight difference. The question says that all kids might be feeling that the assignment is unreasonable, but no one speaks up. Unless one does, and then other starting their discomfort against the assignment. I think the Bandwagon Effect is not about the other kids feeling the assignment being unreasonable, but just because a kid stood up against it, others followed suit regardless of their own beliefs. –  Sunny R Gupta Oct 25 '13 at 7:01
add comment

Your example of no student willing to object until one objects is analagous to Asch's conformity experiments. To quote the Wikipedia article:

In a control group, with no pressure to conform to an erroneous view, only one participant out of 35 ever gave an incorrect answer. Solomon Asch hypothesized that the majority of participants would not conform to something obviously wrong; however, when surrounded by individuals all voicing an incorrect answer, participants provided incorrect responses on a high proportion of the questions (32%). Seventy-five percent of the participants gave an incorrect answer to at least one question. ...

The unanimity of the confederates has also been varied. When the confederates are not unanimous in their judgment, even if only one confederate voices a different opinion, participants are much more likely to resist the urge to conform (only 5–10% conform) than when the confederates all agree.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.