Take the 2-minute tour ×
Cognitive Sciences Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In reinforcement learning, there is a stark distinction between model-based and model-free learning algorithms, where model-free methods don't make use any explicit information about the dynamics of the environment.

It seems like this distinction would have some analog in human learning, but I'm having a very hard time finding any mention of it. Perhaps it would conditioning versus more cognitive forms of learning? I'd be overjoyed if someone could find an article using the term 'model-free' to refer to some aspect of human learning, or just reassure me of the term's correct human analog.

share|improve this question
Are you using google? Google scholar search for "model free reinforcement learning" brings up, as the first hit - before anything else - a cognitive neuroscience study with over 103 citations. There is indeed a developing literature on this topic, and the appropriate term is indeed "model free." –  CHCH Oct 1 '12 at 20:50
@CHCH is referring to this article which for me is also first result. As this is not your first question, I am disappointed by the lack of initial research. It is also not clear to me what you are trying to ask here. Although you make some fun points, I am not sure if this is a question and am voting to close as NARQ. –  Artem Kaznatcheev Oct 2 '12 at 0:17
Sorry about the google miss -- this was question I rediscovered from a few years ago. I should've regoogled before posting, but I didn't realize that something would have changed in a couple years. Sorry for the mishap. However, I don't understand how this isn't a question. What part could use rewording? –  zergylord Oct 2 '12 at 4:48
It is a question, and at its root is a very interesting one, but at this point it is very broad. I don't want to speak for anyone, but I think the others are trying to say that now that you know the terminology, we have "answered" this particular question, so if you use that information to make the question more specific to what you want to know, it will be stronger. FWIW, I'm glad to see you back again as I think you do ask great/interesting questions, this one just needs a bit of tuning and specificity to it. –  Chuck Sherrington Oct 2 '12 at 8:25
Ideally, answer it yourself and go a bit more in depth in your answer while reading through the google hits you now found. It's a genuine question, I prefer not closing it. Just make sure you google a bit better next time. ;p –  Steven Jeuris Oct 3 '12 at 7:42

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.