2
$\begingroup$

As a percentage of their endeavours, do those with a tendency to use bullying focus more or less on sociopaths as a per capita of their targets?

$\endgroup$
7
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Bullying correlates with psychopathic traits such narcissism and impulsiveness while victims of bullying tend to be physically weaker, fearful, less assertive or depressed. Anti-social behavior / psychopathy correlates positively with assertiveness and fearlessness. Thus it seems likely that psychopath are not as exposed to the risk of being bullied as others. $\endgroup$ Jan 15, 2016 at 17:26
  • $\begingroup$ What if a bully saw himself as a responsible leader, using force as a means of governance? $\endgroup$
    – Confused
    Jan 16, 2016 at 23:06
  • $\begingroup$ Sociopath (same as psychopath) is someone "who seems to lack a conscience", so why would any sensible person ever attack someone who would probably stop at nothing to settle the score? It sounds like suicide to me. I think that you have it exactly backwards. Bullies "seem to lack a conscience". Yes? This Question "hasn't received enough attention" (bounty) because it is incoherent and unanswerable. $\endgroup$
    – user9634
    Jan 16, 2016 at 23:58
  • $\begingroup$ You're seemingly assuming bullies are sociopaths. What if that's not the case? $\endgroup$
    – Confused
    Jan 17, 2016 at 0:50
  • $\begingroup$ As to the rest of your comment... it's utterly incoherent, and irrelevant, too. $\endgroup$
    – Confused
    Jan 17, 2016 at 0:51

2 Answers 2

5
+50
$\begingroup$

As a percentage of their endeavours, do those with a tendency to use bullying focus more or less on sociopaths as a per capita of their targets?

Thanks for this interesting question. Based on my research the short answer appears to be that there is no clear evidence either way. The longer answer is that this is probably too complicated a question to easily answer.

Explanation

Based on psychology today I take sociopaths to be those who have:

  • A disregard for laws and social mores
  • A disregard for the rights of others
  • A failure to feel remorse or guilt
  • A tendency to display violent behavior

It is also important to consider that sociopaths develop these traits rather than being born with them, like psychopaths are (see quote from psychology today 1).

Psychopathy is related to a physiological defect that results in the underdevelopment of the part of the brain responsible for impulse control and emotions. Sociopathy, on the other hand, is more likely the product of childhood trauma and physical/emotional abuse. Because sociopathy appears to be learned rather than innate, sociopaths are capable of empathy in certain limited circumstances but not in others, and with a few individuals but not others.

The literature on child bullying suggests that both bullies and victims tend to be more likely to have psychiatric disorders, such as sociopathy. The rates are 13% for bullies/ 8% for victims {1}. This suggests that 92% of those who are bullied are not sociopaths, but it fails to control for the fact that fewer individuals have sociopathic tendencies at that age. What is really needed is a test comparing two samples of children, on with sociopathic tendencies and one without.

An additional complication with this question is that it may be the case that children become sociopaths due to being bullied rather than being bullied because they are sociopaths {2,3}

Indeed some research {e.g., 2} suggests that anti-social personality disorder (which includes sociopathy) is the most common disorder amongst victims of bullying.

I hope this answer has been useful. Please let me know if you would like more information or need clarification on any points.

References:

{1} Copeland, W. E., et al. (2013). "Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence." JAMA psychiatry 70(4): 419-426.

{2} Sourander, A., et al. (2007). "What is the early adulthood outcome of boys who bully or are bullied in childhood? The Finnish “From a Boy to a Man” study." Pediatrics 120(2): 397-404.

{3} Arseneault, L., et al. (2010). "Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems:‘Much ado about nothing’?" Psychological Medicine 40(05): 717-729.

$\endgroup$
11
  • $\begingroup$ It's my suspicion, from large observations of very different bullying in a diverse array of ages on multiple continents (I'm not only asking about children, nor just westerners) that a significant amount of bullying activity is done to control deviant behaviour of those unable to be instructed in morals and ethics in other ways. $\endgroup$
    – Confused
    Jan 19, 2016 at 2:04
  • $\begingroup$ And I'm using the word "instructed" in a weird way, but that's about the closest I can get to an appropriate word. It's not always that they're being reprimanded, it's seemingly that there's an attempt at education and/or preemptive correction/direction intended. $\endgroup$
    – Confused
    Jan 19, 2016 at 2:06
  • $\begingroup$ Of those that would be classified as bullies by the more meek, few I've encountered show signs of sociopathy, other than a higher than average use of violence and intimidation. And, arguably, they show heightened respect and reverence for social mores and rules, and the rights of others - whilst having a very clear and stronger remorse and guilt for those things they determine to be wrong, unjust and/or immoral. Interestingly, this is not just in and of themselves, they also expect similar enlightenment from their peers and those they influence. $\endgroup$
    – Confused
    Jan 19, 2016 at 2:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Unfortunately it seems nobody has done any study of those bullied with an objective of understanding (if there is) any rationale of the activity. $\endgroup$
    – Confused
    Jan 19, 2016 at 2:12
  • $\begingroup$ This seems like a fair answer with good references (+1). @Confused: your anecdotal experience (that bullies are unlikely to be sociopaths) does not seem to be supported by data above. I suspect it is quite hard to define "bully" across situations, so you might be using it differently. $\endgroup$
    – splint
    Jan 19, 2016 at 12:17
0
$\begingroup$

I think the question asked here violates the orthodox discussion around bullying. But indeed, there's a psychological response in normal human beings towards amoral/narcissistic/sociopathic individuals. We do experience the desire to restore normalcy even with violent means. Otherwise stories about medieval knights, superheroes, and the likes would not interest us like they do.

I think normal adults suppress this desire a lot better than children. I have a narcissistic mother who regularly humiliated me in subtle ways. And as I child, I initiated a lot of physical fights with her. From the outside, I looked like a psycho, but victims of narcissistic abuse would know how totally sadistic it is even without violence.

It is possible that children who display narcissistic and sociopathic signs early on get picked up by bullies. Sometimes they are just plain creepy, which is not sufficient reason to beat someone up, but children who are sensitive to these kinds of signals may not be able to suppress the impulse to restore normalcy.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Welcome to Psychology.SE. Please visit our site tour. We work differently to most SE sites, where we have a strict policy that all answers should be backed up with reliable references so that the answer can be independently verified, regardless of the reader's/answerer's background. If you still have trouble with this, feel free to visit the help center or Psychology & Neuroscience Meta. Unreferenced claims can lead to answers being deleted. $\endgroup$ Jul 27, 2019 at 5:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.