Cognitive Sciences Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Larrick (2004; pdf) offers a small number of suggestions for strategies to diminish bias in decision making, which he breaks down into four categories.

  1. "Consider the opposite". Tell decision-makers to ask themselves "What are some reasons my initial judgment might be wrong?"

  2. Training in rules. Teach statistical and logical principles to decision-makers, e.g. give them lessons on the law of large numbers and regression toward the mean.

  3. Training in representations. Teach decision-makers to represent problems in ways that are likely to ameliorate biases. For instance, encourage decision-makers to represent problems in terms of frequencies rather than probabilities, since evidence suggests people reason more accurately when thinking about the former than about the latter.

  4. Training in biases. Larrick suggests that this boils down to seeing if teaching decision-makers behavioral decision theory has positive effects. Larrick implies that so far there is little evidence to suggest this method would work.


  • What other plausible categories of cognitive strategies exist?
  • What other strategies exist within the categories Larrick has defined?


  • Larrick, R.P. (2004). Debiasing. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making, , 316-338. PDF
share|improve this question
"Can readers think of" is not a good fit for a Q&A website and seems more like an invitation for discussion, which StackExchange was not built for. Please restate your two last questions in more objective language. – Artem Kaznatcheev Jun 18 '12 at 14:38
In my not-so-humble opinion, bias is not escapable. All you can really do is choose the right set of biases for the question you're asking. By framing a question to answer in the first place (A decision to make) you've already begun to model the world in a particular way. – Keegan Keplinger Jun 18 '12 at 20:18

One possible strategy is to phrase decision-making problems as questions in a foreign language. There's evidence that this attenuates at least certain kinds of cognitive bias (making you more rational and consistent) by distancing the cognitive and affective baggage that comes with the problem. See the following:

Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S.L., & Sun, G.A. (2012). The Foreign-Language Effect: Thinking in a Foreign Tongue Reduces Decision Biases. Psychological Science, 23 (6), 661-668.

share|improve this answer

Jonathan Baron's book, "Thinking and Deciding", presents decision making, and most other thinking tasks, as a combination of searching and judgment. In most cases, expanding the search phase results in better thinking. In the case of decision making, searching further both for more alternatives before judging between them and for better information for judging between the alternatives.

It isn't specifically about debiasing, but expanding your search has significant debiasing effect.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.